Monday, July 17, 2006

The Calculus of Death

News reports at the hour of this writing indicate that the attacks by Hezbollah rockets on Haifa and the towns of northern Israel have resulted in 24 Israeli deaths, while the retaliatory barrage of Israeli airpower on targets in Lebanon have killed at least 170 human beings. What I see no one asking is this:

In the deadly calculus of war, are we prepared to accept that a lethality ratio of a little better than 7 to 1 deaths, in the name of a right to self-defense, is acceptably proportional, so long as the seven are somehow associated with the bad guys?

By that calculus, America should be perfectly happy to kill about 21,000 Saudis and Yemenis and whatnot in retaliation for 9/11. Except, oh, wait: we substituted Iraqis, didn't we, and raised the ratio by another order of magnitude.

Remember, it's the bad guys who have no respect for human life. That's why we have to kill so many more of them, than they ever do of us.

Or maybe I just never was that good at math.

Stumble Upon Toolbar

3 comments:

brexians said...

I HAVE THE SAME QUESTIONS MY FRIEND!
MAY THE FORCE BE WITH US ALL!!!

Unknown said...

The ratio has since gone to more than ten to one, doulbe that if one is only speaking of civilians.

Anonymous said...

Well said. Sadly you'd expect Hizbollah to target civilians. Yet a democratic state indiscriminately shelling civilian homes and infrastructure to kill the scattered 'terrorists' among them leaves me speechless. Wars are won by the use of disproportionate force but you win nothing by not following fair rules of engagement and international conventions.